Tracy
Tasso
Prof.
Sonia Apgar Begert
English
102
25 May
2015
Literature
Review
U.S.
school performance is always a concern for parents, educators, and those who
wish for intelligent adults able to succeed in today’s world. It has been shown for many years that
America’s schools are not succeeding in accomplishing this task. The country of Finland has repeatedly shown
extraordinarily outstanding results in quality education. It consistently ranks among the best
educational systems in the world. This project will compare the United States
school system with that of Finland, with the topic of school reform in
mind. The research for this project led
to sources from five topic areas: School Reform, Differences between the
American and Finnish school systems, Finnish teacher training, and Finnish
curriculum.
There is
a huge amount of material on the subject of school reform. Some focus on the financial aspect of school
reform. Richard Rothstein and Adam
Schaeffer each wrote articles entitled “Has Spending on Public Schools Risen
Too High?” Rothstein’s article was a ‘no’ answer to the question, while
Schaeffer said ‘yes’. Scott Ellison
takes a different view on school reform.
His article, “Hard-Wired For Innovation? Comparing Two Policy Paths
toward Innovative Schooling”, talks of the market-driven approach to school
reform, and then compares it to a results-driven approach. Ellison points out that schools do not have a
monetary ‘return on investment’, and should not be analyzed in such a manner. David Granger, in “No Child Left Behind and
the Spectacle of Failing Schools: The Mythology of Contemporary School”, is
very harsh in his criticism of ‘No Child Left Behind’ and the forced spectacle
of fighting a war against poor education.
“School Reform”, by Marcia Clemmitt is another very harsh critic of No
Child Left Behind, and has a section on the Finnish school system and some of
its methods.
Looking
at school reform from a different angle is the documentary “The Lottery”, Directed
by Madeleine Sackler in 2010. This film follows four families that have entered
into the entrance lottery for a charter school in New York City because their
zoned public schools have failed their kids.
Then there is the article “Beating the Odds: How Single Black Mothers
Influence the Educational Success of their Sons Enrolled in Failing Schools”,
by Quintin Robinson and Jacob Werblow.
The authors of this piece picked the mothers of four black males that
were high achievers in school and interviewed their mothers in order to learn
how they helped their sons’ successes.
Another documentary looking at the educational system from a different
viewpoint is “The First Year”, directed by Davis Guggenheim in 2004. Guggenheim followed five teachers during
their first year of teaching. Each
teacher tried extremely hard in their jobs.
Four met with varying frustrations, difficulties, and failures. The fifth did achieve a success with her
students in lobbying to have their ESL class continued and not shut down. One teacher-librarian who did have success
was Laura Gross-Warren, who wrote “How Does a Failing School Stop Failing?” Gross-Warren worked in a poor, urban school
district with an ethnic minority-majority student body. In order to increase reading skills and levels she
created a book list tailored to minorities and had all the books placed in
every classroom so that they were readily available to all the students. The reading levels and skills improved. The final documentary that I viewed was “Waiting
for ‘Superman’”, also directed by Davis Guggenheim, in 2010. This documentary
also discusses failing schools, charter schools, and mentions methods of the
Finnish school system. Another work that
talks of Finnish schools and emphasizes experiential schooling is “Last Child
in the Woods” by Richard Louv.
It seems
that some of the methods that the Finnish educators use were picked up from the
United States. Valerie Strauss writes of this and lists the changes that were
adopted in her article, “Five U.S. Innovations that Helped Finland’s Schools
Improve but that American Reformers Now Ignore.” A piece that contrasts the differences
between the American and Finnish national school systems and the aspects of the
Finnish system. One writer, LynNell
Hancock, toured some Finnish schools and interviewed the teacher and quotes
them in her article, “Educating Americans for the 21st Century.” Pasi Stahlberg is a top Finnish education
developer. Anja Franko, in “Finnish
Lessons: What Can the World Learn from Educational Change in Finland?” reviews
Stahlberg’s book by the same name.
Turning
to focus on teachers in Finland and their practices are David Loertscher and
Carol Koechlin in “Finland, Collarboration, and Co-teaching.” This work discusses the freedom that the
instructors had in deciding to partially join their classes for some subjects
and work together. Furthering the
research into Finnish teacher training and its success is Marja-Terttu
Tryggvason with “Why is Finnish Teacher Education Successful? Some Goals Finnish Teacher Educators Have for
Their Teaching.” This article discusses
mandatory Finnish teacher training and the requirements to be a teacher in a
very detailed and useful manner. Two
more excellent articles on Finnish teacher training that will support my
argument about school reform in the United States are, “Steady Work: Finland
Builds a Strong Teaching and Learning System”, by Linda Darling-Hammond and “Teacher Education in Finland” by Olli-Pekka
Malinen, P. Väsänen, and H. Savolainen.
The
subject of Finnish teacher education led to the topic of the Finnish school
curriculum. The article, “Towards
Community Orientated Curriculum in Finnish Literacy Education” by Marita Mäkinen,
discusses how the Finnish curriculum developed over time. A final article
discusses Finnish literacy: “Finnish Education Reaching High Quality and
Promoting Equity” by Pirjo Linnakylä.